Answer:
<em>c) contractual vertical marketing system.</em>
Explanation:
A contractual vertical marketing system <em>requires a legal agreement to manage the overall process between the various levels of the distribution or production chain.</em>
This system allows businesses to take advantage of economies of scale and advertising bounds.
Franchise system, sponsored retail and sponsored wholesale are aspects of a vertical marketing contractual framework.
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
Answer:
$180 billion
Explanation:
The consumption is an act of spending the money from an income. The marginal propensity to consume is the proportion increase in the amount that a consumer is spending. The savings then decline if the consumption increases. In the given scenario the consumption will not raise even if there is an increase in national income and taxes are kept fixed at previous level. This is because marginal propensity to consume is same.
Answer:
$5400 Favorable
Explanation:
Standard 2 hour at $15 per hour
Standard hours 2 hour per unit * 2900 units = 5800 hours
Total Standard cost = 5800 hours * $15 per hour = $87,000
Actual hours = 5100
Actual cost = $81600 / 5100 hours = $16 per hour
Variance = Standard - Actual
Labor hour Variance Favorable = 700 hours (5800 hours - 5100 hours)
Total Labor variance = $5400 ($87,000 - $81,600)
