Answer:
If people go to the tiger habitat they are no longer afraid of tigers. And if people go to the tigers' habitat then the tiger won't attack someone facing them.
Explanation:
Technically this passage would be invalid because it is not logical. It also could be put in the form of a syllogism to make it easier to understand. If you would like to know how to do that, I would be glad to show you!
Hope this helps!!
Your answer is Checking the sentence for correctness. When you key a sentence you’re basically revising it to make sure it is correct.
Answer:
The excerpt tells readers that hunger was tormenting Rainsford by picking at him, like a person might. This use of personification helps to show readers the intensity of Rainsford’s hunger. It also highlights the internal conflict between his hunger and his desire for adventure. We know that he swam for a long time and fell into a deep slumber. He’s now starving but also feeling invigorated. As the story says, “He looks about him, almost cheerfully.” He even gets around and examines the place and finds signs of a struggle that had happened in the vicinity. His intense hunger is in conflict with his urge for adventure. Yet he retains the ability to think clearly and logically: “Where there are pistol shots, there are men. Where there are men, there is food.” Food becomes his priority over adventure, and he sets off to find food, eventually reaching Zaroff’s chateau.
hope this helps
-lvr
Answer:
The sentence fragment, ' scuttled off sideways and stepped into the sea, saying to himself,' is an example of alliteration. Alliteration is a figure of speech that deals with sound. It refers to the repetition of a consonant or a vowel sound.
Explanation:
:)
The correct answer among all the other choices is A.) It represents the perspective of a Federalist, arguing for a strong centralized government. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.