1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pani-rosa [81]
3 years ago
6

Do you think it would have been possible for the British Empire to survive if WWI and WWII had never occurred?

History
1 answer:
RoseWind [281]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

If the British Empire had survived to the present day, it would either have had to liberalize to become a meaningful worldwide transnational polity for everyone who lived inside it, or it would be a grim and likely very racist empire where whites would be privileged over non-whites. There would be no middle ground.

You might be interested in
When it first formed in 1960, the Student Nonviolent Coordination Committee did not promote the use of aggressive action. was ce
dezoksy [38]

did not promote the use of aggressive action.

The Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee or SNCC was formed as a peaceful civil rights organization by Ella Baker to bring young blacks into the movement.

SNCC organized younger blacks into a group to bring about social change using peaceful protest. The group organized the Freedom Rides where blacks challenged the segregation laws for buses. The group also worked to register blacks to vote. Despite the peaceful beginnings, SNCC came under the leadership of Stokely Carmichael in 1966 who began to speak of "black power" turning SNCC into a more militant group which accepted violence as a method of self-defense.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Rames II’s armies help him build a great empire?
Evgesh-ka [11]

Answer: They helped him by building the empires in the way that he meant it to be built.

3 0
3 years ago
alguien me dice que si ¿consideran que existen elementos historicos de tras de las leyendas? lo necesito para hoy es urgente
anygoal [31]

Answer:

Sí, las leyendas suelen contener elementos históricos, y de hecho, es ésto lo que las diferencia de los mitos. Mientras los mitos no tienen base histórica, y son puramente ficción, las leyendas tienden a tener elementos históricos que se mezclan con elementos fantásticos y ficción.

Explanation:

Por ejemplo, las sagas del Rey Arturo son una leyenda. Sus elementos históricos son las invasiones de anglosajones a la Inglaterra de los siglos V y VI, y el posterior enfrentamiento a los reinos britones que habitaban el lugar.

El elemento de ficción o fantástico es el propio personaje de Arturo, ya que no está comprobada su existencia, y otras cosas tales como el santo grial, o la espada excalibur.

5 0
3 years ago
What does nour ed-din have made as a symbol of liberation?<br> I need to know fast
FrozenT [24]
He had a statue made
8 0
3 years ago
Why do you think members of the Lewis and Clark expedition gathered these particular items?
Mkey [24]

Answer:They gather rocks plants and maped out the whole area

Explanation: I was there by the way the Names Lewis

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the colonists reaction to bunker hill
    9·1 answer
  • PLS NEED HELP ASAP Identify where the mixed economies of Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa lie on the continuum.
    11·2 answers
  • Where is the Persian Gulf?
    10·1 answer
  • What was a common feature of the domains whose daimyo opposed the shogun?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the Arabian Peninsula’s location affect ability to trade?
    15·1 answer
  • What was one argument against immigration? O A. Immigrants used public services but didn't pay taxes. O B. Immigrants only wante
    6·1 answer
  • A citizen’s strong loyalty to his city-state enabled Greeks to unify. true or false
    9·2 answers
  • Explain how scientists use geologic time to determine the age of landforms.
    12·1 answer
  • True or False: Photosynthesis is responsible for the world's oxygen supply which is needed for animals to survive.
    10·1 answer
  • Martin Van Buren won the election in 1836 because he won 170 of the “___” votes.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!