<span>I am assuming that what you are asking is how does Buddhism today compare to what the Buddha taught. Buddhism over the years has been enriched by each culture that has been exposed to; changing the nature of practice just slightly each time. So Chan Buddhism (China) is slightly different in practice then is Zen Buddhism (Japan, Korea). But the teachings have always remained the same. Now when I speak of practice, it is the methods used to teach the Dharma (the teachings). The biggest change in Buddhism since the Buddha is the development of Mahayana Buddhism. Mahayana Buddhism, which added teachings from later Buddhas and Bodhisattvas to The Buddha's original teachings in regards to living a compassionate life to help all other beings. So Buddhism adapts the methods but never the message or teachings.</span>
The decision in Bush v. Vera can promote the redistricting of states, creating new districts based on the existence of social minorities.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The case Bush v. Vera wanted to assess cases of racial gerrymandering, allowing social minorities to receive attention and representation in the creation of districts.
- This case happened because states that had the majority of their population composed of people from social minorities, were ignored in the creation of districts, which created a low representation of these minorities in congress.
In this case, it was decided that the redistricting of states was something that should be promoted, as this was within the Fourteenth Amendment, which may promote new districts to be created.
You can get more information about gerrymandering at the link below:
brainly.com/question/13159430
Answer:
C. Lack of rain or disease could destroy a food supply.
Explanation:
When people first adopted agricultural lifestyle the main challenge they had was natural causes destroying the food supplies.
This is actually a problem that exists until today, as the climate or disease of the crops can severely affect the production. In the parts of the world with a huge industry, this can be prevented.
Yet, parts that don't incorporate much of the industry into agricultural processes, like it was in the ancient times, the floods, storms, blizzards, droughts, etc. affect food supplies a lot and propose a threat to the nourishment of the people.
<u>Back in the days, people had no means of fighting the diseases that would attack plants or oppose the weather conditions, so once a disease or disaster attacks the agricultural resources they would stay without a large part of the supply for the upcoming period. </u>