Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
It is complex language and homo sapiens.
A the government is failing because the president shut it down which made people not get their checks so, since they did not get their checks other people who work for the government are looking for other jobs which is making the system fail
There is no single definition of the word restaurant because there are many different types of restaurants. Some people consider a restaurant simply an eating establishment, while others do not consider fast food or take out “restaurants” because the person is not sitting down and eating in the establishment. This is why it is hard to pinpoint one single definition of restaurant. One can say a restaurant is a casual dining restaurant. Others can say it is a fancy restaurant or a fine dining restaurant. Some may consider Burger King a restaurant while others do not think Burger King fits the definition. Restaurants can be put in specific categories, but there will never be a single definition of the word because it is a word that needs more classification than just one single definition.
