By definition, empirical probability is equal to C. Number of successful trials/Total number of trials.
<h3>What is an empirical probability?</h3>
It should be noted that empirical probability simply means a experimental probability that is based on historical data.
In this case, by definition, empirical probability is equal to the number of successful trials divided by the total number of trials.
Learn more about empirical probability on:
brainly.com/question/16972278
#SPJ1
Answer: substantial
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Greta is concerned that one of the potential market segments she has identified for her dog grooming service is too small and has too little income to have sufficient buying power.
The above analysis shows that Greta is concerned with whether the substantial segment. A segment is said to be substantial when the said segment is big and therefore should be worth targeting and the members of this particular segment should have buying power.
Answer:
$50,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Interest owned by Gladys Peel in the capital and profits of the partnership = 50%
Fair market value = $10,000
Value of the land acquired = $16,000
Partnership's net income = $94,000
Loss recorded = $6,000
Now,
The loss must be separately passed through to partners as it is a Sec. 1231 loss.
Therefore,
Partnership ordinary income = $94,000 + $6,000
= $100,000
Hence,
Peel's distributive share of ordinary income from the partnership for 2019
= 50% of Partnership ordinary income
= 0.50 × $100,000
= $50,000
Answer:
The difference between the two is that Hazard insurance can cover you and or protect you against "structural damage caused by natural disasters".
Meanwhile Homeowners insurance is "a financial protection against theft"...
So, long story short,
Hazard insurance=protection from natural disasters (structural damage)
Hazard insurance=protection from natural disasters (structural damage)Homeowners insurance=protection against theft and damage to your home and belongings
I hope this helped!!
Answer:
Option A is the correct answer - Linda, whose moral reasoning is based on the approval of other people
Explanation:
In stage three of Kohlberg's theory of moral development, the individual (such as Linda, mentioned in the question) set out to do the things that are considered “right” because it is good, not only for the family, but also for the school, church or peer group.
This stage, often known as the "good boy/good girl" stage, has morality, often spelt out as acting in conformity to what the social group general requires to be right and moral.
