Answer:
As the generations are increasing or gets much over time, we have a more likelihood of seeing a response to natural selections as the favourable alleles are going to be moved from one generation to the next while those that are not favourable would be eliminated over generations.
If the new host gives allowance for early reproduction and ease of access then the generations each year would rise.
In this case, c) mimicry is the answer. In Batesian mimicry in which harmless animals mimic toxic animals. In this case, I assume the milk snake is harmless and the coral snake is venomous. Since the milk snake has a trait similar to deadly coral snake, less animals would eat it thinking it is dangerous. Over time all the milk snake that look like the deadly coral snake would survive leading to evolution by natural selection. This would lead to more and more milk snake mimicking the resemblance of the deadly coral snake.
a) The deadly coral snake has a warning color adaptive radiation. If the question had described the environment and how the snaked adapted to the environment via warning coloration. This would've been correct.
b) cryptic coloration is more about camouflage with the environment. If the question had state how a certain feature help one of the animals blend into the background. This would've been correct.
d) I'm not sure whats different between this and a so i'll consider them both the same.
When the structure and function of an organism adjusts to its environment it is adapting.
Alexandria, I believe. I hope this is helpful and brainliest would be nice ;)
