The True statements are.
Organisms in a population must compete for the resources as the resources are limited and the organism that compete and survives wins.
The best equipped organism survive which is known as the survival of the fittest.
Over the time due to challenges in the environment the beneficial variation takes place in the organisms and it spreads through the generations and then it gradually changes the whole population.
The false statement is Organism of the same species are equipped with the same survival skills.
The organism of the same species have some variation and because of this variation they compete and win against the other member of the same species.
The end product is proteins.
It is possible! I can't do a Punnett square, however, but if both parents are carriers (Ww and Ww), then a child has the potential to inherit the recessive gene from both. <span />
The amount of sleep you get is the independent variable because it does not depend on the scores on tests
Answer:
Option A, Competition has restricted the ranges of both species
Explanation:
When two species which depend on the exactly same kind of resources, get into a mode where they prefer to stay in two different ecosystems without interfering each other’s circle and thus they get excluded from each other due to competition. This phenomenon of the ecosystem is called Competitive exclusion
According to Gause's Law of competitive exclusion two species which are competing for similar kind of resources are unable to stay together.
Hence, option A is the correct choice.
