I believe the answer is: <span>person-situation controversy
</span><span>person-situation controversy refers to a debate in the field of psychology which argue whether a person or the situation play a more crucial factor in determining a person's behavior.
</span>
Experts who support the 'person' side in this controversy believed that people with bad personality traits would always do bad behaviors regardless the situation they're in.
Experts who support the 'situation' side in this controversy believed that bad behaviors only occurs because the people are facing bad situations in their life.
Most people in Latin America speak Spanish
Answer:
Explanation:
Graphs for Different Correlation Coefficients
Correlation Coefficient = +1: A perfect positive relationship. Correlation Coefficient = 0.8: A fairly strong positive relationship. Correlation Coefficient = 0.6: A moderate positive relationship. Correlation Coefficient = 0: No relationship.
Answer:
Correct answer is They wanted to remain loyal to the king.
Explanation:
First and last options are not correct because the colonist didn't wanted war and were trying to prevent any further conflict.
Second option is not correct as they didn't wanted to change Parliament, but someone who would represent their interests in the same.
Third option is correct as they wanted to show their allegiance to the king, but also asked him to take into consideration the problems that were tormenting them.
Dictator that it what its called
