1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Llana [10]
3 years ago
11

8

History
1 answer:
aivan3 [116]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: M. The Judicial branch determined whether or not laws were to be executed.

Explanation: Marshall is making a point that it's up to the courts not to politicians to decide what is and what isn't constitutional. Prior to the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Marbury v. Madison 1803, the judicial branch of government was extraordinarily weak. It could interpret the law but did not have the final say on whether a specific law was constitutional or not.

You might be interested in
After incorporation, state governments had to:
aniked [119]
Who Was responsible for raising his own guerilla army and attacking the British supply trains ?
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a unique feature of credit unions?
nevsk [136]
I'm going to guess and say that there are choices and go with Credit unions are typically owned and run by their members and Credit unions limit membership to certain people or groups.
8 0
3 years ago
Quais as fases da história da Índia
Rus_ich [418]

Answer:

História da Índia – Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre

Esta fase da história da Índia é conhecida como o período védico ou era védica. Sua fase primitiva testemunhou a formação de diversos reinos da Índia antiga; em ...

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the League of Nations respond to genocide prior to 1945?
Ratling [72]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options for this question we can say the following.

How did the League of Nations respond to genocide prior to 1945?

The League of Nations responded to genocide prior to 1945 in a weak way. The League of Nations failed to politically and militarily challenge this terrible act.

The League of Nations was a forum to resolve disputes among member countries. Through its charter, member nations pledged to act collectively against any country that attacked a member country. However, in reality, it did never had the proper organization and coordination to address important issues such as genocide.

The League of Nations was formed after World War 1 in order to prevent another armed conflict. It was the precursor of the United Nations. United States President Woodrow Wilson was one of the most important supporters of the idea although, in the end, the United States decided no to be part of the League.

8 0
3 years ago
7. What trend do you notice in the Democratic vote in the 1940 election?
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Answer:

Democrat, broke with tradition and ran for a third term, which became a major issue. The surprise Republican ...

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why is the market demand curve downwards sloping
    8·1 answer
  • What is 1/2 minus 5/12
    14·2 answers
  • Which group was most harmed by railroad pools and monopolies?
    7·2 answers
  • Why do you think the Equal Rights Amendment was never ratified?
    11·2 answers
  • What are some interesting details you notice in the map
    5·1 answer
  • How did you participate in economics during the past week? Using your outline, write a four- to five-sentence paragraph in respo
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement describes one difference between the independence
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following did European investors bring to Latin America?
    8·1 answer
  • What conditions in the north might explain the many roles taken by the black chruch
    6·1 answer
  • What was the result of the issue from the election of 1800?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!