1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pochemuha
3 years ago
9

Can you make 10

Chemistry
2 answers:
max2010maxim [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

dont mind me just taking your points

Explanation:

Mice21 [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Let's go do some kung

kapag will we talk?

sakali I loved someone

come and sana with me

Baka everyone here is baka!!

your such a pagka

Pascal difference has a value of 1000 millipascals difference

You might be interested in
26 g of zinc combines with 12.8 g of sulfur. What is the empirical formula of zinc sulfide?
Alisiya [41]
Moles of Zn: 26 / 65 = 0.4
Moles of S: 12.8 / 32 = 0.4

Molar ratio of Zn : S = 1 : 1
Empircal formula: ZnS

The answer is C
7 0
3 years ago
Aluminum boils at 2467°C. Aluminum’s boiling point in Kelvin is 2194.<br> T or F
dusya [7]
That is false because aluminum melts at 2,470C
7 0
3 years ago
How many milliliters of water at 25.0°C with a density of 0.997 g/mL must be mixed with 163 mL of coffee at 97.9°C so that the r
Stolb23 [73]

Answer:

248 mL

Explanation:

According to the law of conservation of energy, the sum of the heat absorbed by water (Qw) and the heat released by the coffee (Qc) is zero.

Qw + Qc = 0

Qw = -Qc [1]

We can calculate each heat using the following expression.

Q = c × m × ΔT

where,

  • c: specific heat
  • m: mass
  • ΔT: change in the temperature

163 mL of coffee with a density of 0.997 g/mL have a mass of:

163 mL × 0.997 g/mL = 163 g

From [1]

Qw = -Qc

cw × mw × ΔTw = -cc × mc × ΔTc

mw × ΔTw = -mc × ΔTc

mw × (54.0°C-25.0°C) = -163 g × (54.0°C-97.9°C)

mw × 29.0°C = 163 g × 43.9°C

mw = 247 g

The volume corresponding to 247 g of water is:

247 g × (1 mL/0.997 g) = 248 mL

8 0
3 years ago
A solution...
steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After he conducted cathode ray tube experiments proving the existence of negatively charged particles we now call electrons, Tho
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

Answer is explained below;

Explanation:

In 1904, after the discovery of the electron, the English physicist Sir J.J. Thomson proposed the plum pudding model of an atom. In this model, the atom had a positively-charged space with negatively charged electrons embedded inside it i.e., like a pudding (positively charged space) with plums (electrons) inside.

In 1911, another physicist Ernest Rutherford proposed another model known as the Rutherford model or planetary model of the atom that describes the structure of atoms. In this model, the small and dense atom has a positively charged core called the nucleus. Also, he proposed that just like the planets revolving around the Sun, the negatively charged electrons are moving around the nucleus.

By conducting a gold foil experiment, Rutherford disproved Thomson's model. In this experiment, positively charged alpha particles emitted from a radioactive source enclosed within a protective lead were used which was then focused into a narrow beam. It was then passed through a slit in front of which a thin section of gold foil was placed. A fluorescent screen (coated with zinc sulfide) was also placed in front of the slit to detect alpha particles which on striking the fluorescent screen would produce scintillation (a burst of light) which was visible through a microscope attached to the back of the screen.

He observed that most of the alpha particles passed straight through the gold foil without any resistance and this implied that atoms contain a large amount of open space. The slight deflection of some of the alpha particles, the large-angle scattering of other alpha particles and even the bouncing back of a very few alpha particles toward the source suggested their interactions with other positively charged particles inside the atom.

So, he concluded that only a dense and positively charged particle such as the nucleus would be responsible for such strong repulsion. Also, the negatively charged electrons electrically balanced the positive nuclear charge and they moved around the nucleus in circular orbits. Between the electrons and nucleus, there was an electrostatic force of attraction just like the gravitational force of attraction between the sun and the revolving planets.

Later, the Rutherford model was replaced by the Bohr atomic model.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is it possible to tell if an acid or base is strong or weak just by looking at its chemical formula?
    15·1 answer
  • Just need 2 more, please help asap!!
    10·1 answer
  • What type of reaction is Mg + H2Cl2 — MgCl2 + H2?
    14·1 answer
  • Emission nebulae are also called ____ because they are composed of ionized hydrogen.
    11·1 answer
  • Calculate the wavelength, in nanometers, of the light emitted by a hydrogen atom when its electron fallsfrom the n = 7 to the n
    10·1 answer
  • 29.47 mL of a solution of the acid HBr is titrated, and 72.90 mL of 0.2500-M NaOH is required to reach the equivalence point. Ca
    13·1 answer
  • 6.75 L of carbon dioxide gas are stored at a pressure of 175 atm. If the temperature and number of gas particles do not change,
    5·1 answer
  • Using just the valence electrons on each atom determine which 2 atoms should be in the same group?
    5·1 answer
  • Magnesium (Mg) has nine electrons. Which of the following shows the correct electron configuration for an atom of Mg?
    10·2 answers
  • Why is it necessary to standardize a secondary standard before use?<br>​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!