So first off you divide 360 visitors by 3 hours this will give you the average amount of visitors per hour 360/3=120 so there are about 120 visitors per hour then you would multiply 120 by 7 to find out the amount of people who would ride the coaster in 7 hours. 120 times 7=840
Answer:
The quadratic formula helps you solve quadratic equations, and is probably one of the top five formulas in math. Then the formula will help you find the roots of a quadratic equation, i.e. the values of x where this equation is solved.
Answer:
you have to use the knowledge and vertically opposite angles corresponding angles
vertically opposite meaning the angle vertically opposite to 84 is at 4 then corresponding angles to get what is 2x then divide your answer by 2
AccordingAccording to the floor plan, the one that is closest to the total length, in feet, of the walls that Kamal should quote to the artist is: 58.65.
<h3>Length</h3>
Let the length of hypotenuse be x
Using Pythagorean theorems
x²=(19-15)²+12²
x²=16+144
x²=160
x=√160
x=12.649
x=12.65 (Approximately)
Hence:
Total length:
Total length=12.65+15+12+19
Total length=58.65
Therefore according to the floor plan, the one that is closest to the total length, in feet, of the walls that Kamal should quote to the artist is: 58.65.
Learn more about length here:brainly.com/question/2217700
#SPJ1
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's consider the first answer choice:
The times in the semifinals were faster on average than the times in the finals.
We don't have to calculate the mean values of each distribution because we can see visually that the center of the final round distribution is lower than the center of the semifinal round distribution.
Since lower times are faster, we can't say that the times in the semifinals were faster on average than the times in the finals.
Hint #22 / 3
Now, let's consider the second answer choice:
The times in the finals vary noticeably less than the times in the semifinals.
We can see visually that the final round distribution is more spread out than the semifinal round distribution. We could calculate MAD or IQR from these displays, but we can see that the range of the final round distribution is larger.
So we can't conclude that the times in the finals vary noticeably less than the times in the semifinals.
Hint #33 / 3
Select this answer:
None of the above