Leisha is likely to be about three years old. This is because, between age two and three, children usually increase in length by about 3 - 5 inches and gained about 4 pounds. In the first two years of life, growth is faster than this while between the ages of four and six, growth is slower.
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
1 pound = $1.60
1 pound = $1.50
So, there is a depreciation in the value of pound relative to the dollar and appreciation in the value of dollar relative to the pound.
Now, suppose a resident of united states purchase some quantity of goods(say, 20 shirts) from the seller in United kingdom.
Price of each shirt = 2 pounds
Hence,
Before the change in exchange rate, then the buyer have to pay in dollars:
= 20 × (2 × $1.60)
= 20 × 3.2
= $64
After the change in exchange rate, then the buyer have to pay in dollars:
= 20 × (2 × $1.50)
= 20 × 3
= $60
Hence, the amount paid by the resident of united states reduced because of the fall in exchange rate. Now, they have to pay less for the same amount of commodities. This shows that there is an appreciation in the currency of US relative to UK.
Answer:
D) The extra energy benefits Patrick gets from another can are no longer worth the cost. MB/MC (S)
Explanation:
The optimal quantity for Patrick to consume is 5 cans of GreenCow.
This is the quantity where MARGINAL BENEFIT EQUALS MARGINAL COST. For all quantities up to the 5th, the marginal benefit is higher than the marginal cost. This means that Patrick's net benefit is increasing, and consuming all units up to this point make him better off.
If Patrick were to consume any more than 5 cans of GreenCow, the cost of each additional can would be higher than the additional benefit (because the marginal cost curve is higher than the marginal benefit curve). Consuming any cans beyond the 5th, therefore, makes him worse off.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The answer is yes because education/training will make it so you have more experience/knowledge than the next worker
Answer:
Debit : Allowance for doubtful debts = $2900
Credit : Accounts receivables = $2900
Explanation:
An account for allowance for doubtful debts is a contra account created, predicting that certain debtors will not be able to pay for the goods and services they purchased. This may be based on historical experiences. Doubtful debts aren’t officially uncollectible, it is simply an estimation made, but bad debts are, where you have officially written off a certain accounts receivable as uncollectible.
An allowance for doubtful debts is recorded in the balance sheet, directly under accounts receivables. Bad debts are recorded as an expense in the income statement. When there is an allowance for doubtful debts, the bad debts account is debited and the allowance for doubtful debts account is credited.
According to the question, the balance was $2,200 (Cr) in the allowance for doubtful debts account. The initial expected amount for allowance for doubtful debts was $5100 (Cr). This means that the difference was the amount that was declared as uncollectible and officially written off i.e. bad debts. Thus $2900 ($5100 -$2200) would have been confirmed as bad debts.
The entry to record the above transaction is:
Debit : Allowance for doubtful debts = $2900
Credit : Accounts receivables = $2900
