Answer:
Yes they are sustainable
Explanation:
The strategies mentioned in the question were laid out my Michael Porter and therefore, we can look analyse his model to understand whether these strategies are sustainable or not.
Porter has categorized strategies into 3 broad categories: Cost Leadership, Differentiation, and Focus strategies (all three are known as "Generic Strategies). Focus strategy is branched out into two sub-segments known as Cost Focus and Differentiation Focus.
Now, the question has already clarified that the strategies in question are both focus strategies. So lets understand what each entails.
Differentiation Focus: A strategy in which the company aims to gain market leadership in a focused market (a specific market) through strategic differentiaion. This strategic differentiaion involves offering a specialized service or a unique product in a niche market. Cost focus strategy is similar in the sense is that that the aim is to offer highly low cost products/services to a niche market. Because of the focus on these niche markets, company's develop a strong understansing of the consumer thereby developing strong brand loyalty with that particular customer base. The key ingredient, again, is that the competitive advantage is being harnessed by focusing just on a particular niche market. Another key component is that the companies using this strategy rely on the consumers in the target market having different needs, tastes, and requirements than consumers in other segments in the industry.
Now, these strategies by desig were put forth my Porter has being sustainable. Hence the term "generic strategies" in that they can be broadly used to create and sustain performance. The focus strategies as defined above are sustainable since they harness the power of having priority knowledge of their target market to provide appropriate services and products. The high brand loyalty and knowledge of consumers give them an edge over competitors (competitive rivalry). Supplier power depends on the nature of products being offered therefore it cant be taken into consideration. Buyer power can be managed since you are prodiving unique service offerings to unique customers. Threat of substitution depends on the product and service offering. Threat of new entry by larger player exists, but due to the focus that the company had in the target market, barriers to entry (long strong brand loyalty) can be developed.
The correct answer would be, Primary Data.
This type of research is described by marketing professionals as the collection of Primary Data.
Explanation:
There are two types of data that is being collected and used for a research. They are as follows:
- Primary Data
- Secondary Data
Primary data is the data which is collected for the purpose for which the research is being conducted. Secondary data is the data which was collected for some other purpose but can be used in the current research as well.
So when the marketing department will collect a lot of information on what customers want while they are at the park, through surveys and direct questioning, the team of marketing department will basically be collecting the Primary data for their research in which they will come to know about the customer needs and wants directly.
Learn more about types of data at:
brainly.com/question/13536450
#LearnWithBrainly
A witness testimony would be direct evidence. Hope you found that helpful :)
Answer: Degree of Operating Leverage
A Tech = 2.75
Z Tech = 3
Explanation:
As defined in question itself,
Degree of Operating Leverage = 
As here, it is provided that profit for both the companies are same amounting $4 million.
Although the fixed cost differ by $1 million.
A Tech Degree of operating Leverage = 1 + 
= 2.75
Z Tech Degree of Operating Leverage = 1 + 
= 3
This clearly demonstrates that A Tech will reach its break even faster than the Z Tech as the ratio of fixed cost to variable cost is lower in A tech in comparison to Z Tech.
Answer:
True. Yes, the theory can be falsified.
Explanation:
Theory X would more specifically refer to the theory of supply and demand, which states that individuals will buy more of a particular good if their income rises. From this theory, comes the concept of "normal good", which are precisely the goods that people buy more as their income rises.
This theory could be falsified by empirical observation: a study could be made, including a good number of subjects, to see whether their purchasing habits are directly related to their income.
