1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
arlik [135]
2 years ago
11

Describe the popular forms of art in the 19th century. (Site 2)

Social Studies
1 answer:
ratelena [41]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

· Realism, often referred to as Naturalism, originated in France in the 1850’s in the wake of the 1848 French Revolution

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Since no one is answering, having to repost.​
borishaifa [10]

im only here for points lol.

5 0
2 years ago
Would nepal be so beautiful if it were a plain, hill or mountain only? Discuss​
neonofarm [45]

Answer:

yes it would be nice and great

Explanation:

this is because it is done in a plain idea of it

4 0
1 year ago
Do you think it is a good or bad idea for Quebec to become an independent nation? Explain. (Please use RACE when answering this
Serjik [45]

Answer:

Yes, Quebec should be a country.

Canada is a federation, meaning that its citizens have to pay taxes for both the federal (canadian) government and the provincial (quebec) government. This split makes it harder for the people of Quebec to strategically invest in its own industries. For example, Quebec has long ago nationalized hydroelectricity making the state a leader in green energy. When Quebecers decided to do so, the canadian government refused to invest even a single dollar in the project. Quebec’s prime minister at that time had to go see the americans to ask for a sufficient loan. What a shame it was to the canadian government going against such a nice project! Fast forward to now, Nova Scotia government (another province located next to Quebec being part of the canadian confederation) has the project to built all the infrastructure to export hydroelectricity to the US… and guess what? Canadian Government is totally in favor of the idea and willing to fund the project with fresh capital, part of that capital coming from taxes paid by Quebecers. So Quebec taxes will help fund a competitor since Quebec is already exporting a lot of energy to their US partners while it had absolutely no help when they built their own hydroelectricity project.

This example is just one of the many examples that Quebecers have had to endure over the past decades. When the financial crisis happened in 08-09, Ontario’s auto industry have been bailed out for more than $10 Billion from the Canadian Government (again, part of this money - roughly 20% - came from Quebec’s taxes paid to the federal government). At that same time, Quebec was struggling with its paper/pulp industry and the federal government injected less than 100M$ in the industry to help it. Now Bombardier, one of the great engeneering business of Quebec is struggling, and guess what? Quebec has to inject all of the money to help them since canadian government won't do a single thing.

A lot of the people in Quebec stand against the building of pipelines that would allow dirty oil sands to cross the eastern part of the country for international exportation. Canadians want Quebec to accept the pipeline since it would help the western part of the country to export/sell its dirty oil internationally. As a province, Quebec doesn’t have any legal capacity to oppose to such project while this goes a lot against their willingness. If Quebec was a country, it could oppose to such thing and participate to a greater extend to a cleaner planet. Quebecers have all the capacity and knowledge to invest massively in clean energy and stop using oil for transport over a short timeframe. The only things that is keeping them away is the fact that it does not have control over all its revenues while the federal government have a totally different gameplan.

Being a country would allow Quebecers to gain 100% control over their taxes and would leave them with more money to do good things for the whole planet. We would be leaders in clean energy instead of subsidizing the dirty oilsands in the western part of the country. Our army would be one of peace keeping and territory protection and our peace keeping message would be heard amongst UN and UNESCO. We would be a much better leader amongst nations willing the reduce greenhouse gas instead of financing oil sands. Our engineering firms like Hydro-Quebec would be venturing project like electrification of transport.

Not only Quebec should be a country but people all around the world should support them in their quest for the building of a great new country.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
________ is the right of an owner of property such as plants or animals to increase in the property. the owner of a cow, for exa
Burka [1]

<u>Accession </u>is the right of an owner of property such as plants or animals to increase in the property. The owner of a cow, for example, owns the calves born to the cow.

A method of gaining property known as accession property law entails the labor- or material-based addition of value to the property.

According to property law, accession refers to the process of obtaining property by enhancing existing property with labour or raw materials like plants. Owning property automatically grants the right to hold anything that is contributed to or created by it .

An illustration of accession is as follows: If someone permits someone else to harvest undesired alfalfa from their land and make it into bales of feed for livestock, that person may then acquire the finished product.

To learn more about  property law, refer

brainly.com/question/9723234

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
A state constitutional provision conflicts with a federal statute. The: Select one: a. federal statute is supreme. b. federal st
stepladder [879]

Answer:

This correct answer is a.

Explanation:

Though states can pass laws which apply locally, the Federal government has the final say when there is a conflict between a Federal and a State law. The supremacy clause, article VI of the constitution, says that any Federal law that prohibits a certain practice supersedes any kind of state law. For example, if the state law permits the use of marijuana but the federal law issues a prohibition, the state should comply with the federal law or the federal government can stop the state legislation.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • what was the structure of the legislative body created by the articles of confederation? a) bicameral, b) unicameral, c) tri-cam
    11·1 answer
  • How do anthropologists use the absolute dating technique to study pre history
    14·1 answer
  • Which group of people supported the Fugitive Slave Act?
    15·1 answer
  • Who was the first to discover Islam? Where did he proclaim that Islam fell in order with other major religions
    12·2 answers
  • What aspects of the New Deal, if any, do you see in American society today?
    5·1 answer
  • What was one of the most persuasive arguments for the constitution
    10·1 answer
  • What is the name of the zone of life on earth
    8·2 answers
  • Why did spanish colonies need many workers
    15·1 answer
  • Believing that her grandmother is hearing-impaired, Sharon typically speaks very slowly and loudly to her. Actually, her grandmo
    8·1 answer
  • The nurse is administering an iv push medication through an iv lock. after injecting the medication, which action will be taken
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!