Harriet Martineau is considered the first female sociologist and argued that injustices such as slavery and women’s inequality stunted a society’s moral development.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
The answer is like the second choice, “Africa’s river systems made it easy for Europeans to reach the the African interior”. We can determine this is correct by cancelling out the other options.
1- yes, Africa WAS rich in natural resources, but the Europeans did not care much for that. They had come to Africa for trade and slaves.
3- similar to A, the Europeans weren’t there because they were running out of space, yes they did conquer and claim lands in Africa, but the purpose of them being there was goods.
4- a lot like C, but not very relevant at all, especially since at this time the Europeans who were traveling definitely did not farm, they wanted their goods already prepared.
Since the other options have been ruled out, I will explain 2 a little bit. Obviously, the Europeans had sailed to Africa. At first the remained on the edges of it, taking over ports and just sailing along picking up slaves and continuing west. A good example of an African river used by the Europeans is the Congo River. It branches out throughout all of Congo and it’s historical importance is that an explorer named Henry Morton Stanley used it to continue into Africa. Though he may not sound familiar, we’ve all heard the phrase “Doctor Livingstone, I presume”. It was Stanley who said this once meeting with him.
Hi there!
One such reason is the fact that the UN's job is to maintain peace and help other countries. If the president went to them, he can see what they think the best option is, being as they are not just apart of the US, and their main objective is to help other countries!
Hope this helps!
Almost 6 million jews were killed. Also, half of Japan's population died because of the bombing from U.S.
Hope this helped
Answer:
Which of the following is not correct? B. Because many of the poorest families receive in-kind transfers, more families have lower standards of living when compared to poverty rates based on income.
Explanation:
To understand this, we have to analyze the options:
a) It is correct that many inequality instruments are only based on income. But not all of them, that is why many are perfectly used. So it's not the correct answer, but it's correct.
c) it is also true because it is again recalling the income as a wrong medium to measure equality. Even though this time is in the form of loans or savings.
d) it is true because many times people don't have permanent ways of income but temporary. So this biases the data.
b) is not correct because in-kind transfers have been an effective way to fight poverty and they don't delimit a family to a lower standard. This is not a known fact, but an assumption based on a belief. Because it could be true or not, based on the posture of the family of study and the use they assign to the transfers.