Natural selection or survival of the fittest can cause a major evolution as the species at risk need to stay alive and therefore need to become more adapted to the situation at hand. The species can evolve through generations to become more crafted to the predatorial habits of their predators. If the females are less at risk than the males then the males might evolve to become more protected or if some of the species live in a different situation maybe not even that far away, that can have a big impact on the evolutionary habits of the species at hand.
I hope I'm right
Answer: The two possible explanation for the outcome are as follows:
Explanation:
1. The bacterial DNA in the pellet was not completely isolated properly, therefore, no fluorescence was observed in the pellet under the exposure of UV radiation.
2. After 3 hours of induction with the IPTG and labeling with the G3. The IPGT might not be able to bound to the bacterial DNA that could show response of fluorescence in the ultraviolet light.
Thunder is caused by the extremely rapid expansion of air around a bolt of lightning due to the very high temperature. It is also caused by the change of pressure around a lightning bolt.
Hope that helped you.
Given what we know, we can confirm that the aspect of nucleic acids and transcription that can help explain this discrepancy is that of alternative splicing.
<h3>Alternative Splicing.</h3>
- This process allowed the cells to use a single gene for the creation of various proteins.
- This process includes the separation of RNA at splicing sites to create new versions of the mRNA strand.
- This helps to increase the diversity of mRNA's available and create more proteins.
Therefore, given that alternative splicing allows the cells to create multiple forms of distinct proteins from a single gene, this allowed our organisms to develop the vast number of proteins we use, without the need for a much larger genome.
To learn more about genome visit:
brainly.com/question/20215717?referrer=searchResults
An educated guess is the best way to describe hypothesis