Answer:
0 ≤ t ≤ 5.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the function 
, 
is the independent variable. The domain of 
is the set of all values of that this function can accept.
In this case, is defined in a real-life context. Hence, consider the real-life constraints on the two variables. Both time and volume should be non-negative. In other words,
.
.
The first condition is an inequality about , which is indeed the independent variable.
However, the second condition is about , the dependent variable of this function. It has to be rewritten as a condition about .
![\begin{aligned} f(t) &\ge 0 &&\text{Assumption} \cr 80000 - 16000\, t& \ge 0 && \text{Definition of} ~ f \cr 80000 & \ge 16000\, t && \begin{aligned}&\text{Add $16000\, t$} \\[-0.5em] & \text{to both sides of the inequality}\end{aligned} \cr 5 &\ge t &&\begin{aligned}&\text{Divide both sides of} \\[-0.5em] & \text{the inequality by $16000$}\end{aligned} \cr t &\le 5 && \text{Flip the inequality}\end{aligned}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Baligned%7D%20f%28t%29%20%26%5Cge%200%20%26%26%5Ctext%7BAssumption%7D%20%5Ccr%2080000%20-%2016000%5C%2C%20t%26%20%5Cge%200%20%26%26%20%5Ctext%7BDefinition%20of%7D%20~%20f%20%5Ccr%2080000%20%26%20%5Cge%2016000%5C%2C%20t%20%26%26%20%5Cbegin%7Baligned%7D%26%5Ctext%7BAdd%20%2416000%5C%2C%20t%24%7D%20%5C%5C%5B-0.5em%5D%20%26%20%5Ctext%7Bto%20both%20sides%20of%20the%20inequality%7D%5Cend%7Baligned%7D%20%5Ccr%205%20%26%5Cge%20t%20%26%26%5Cbegin%7Baligned%7D%26%5Ctext%7BDivide%20both%20sides%20of%7D%20%5C%5C%5B-0.5em%5D%20%26%20%5Ctext%7Bthe%20inequality%20by%20%2416000%24%7D%5Cend%7Baligned%7D%20%5Ccr%20t%20%26%5Cle%205%20%26%26%20%5Ctext%7BFlip%20the%20inequality%7D%5Cend%7Baligned%7D)
.
Hence, t ≤ 5.
Combine the two inequalities to obtain the domain:
0 ≤ t ≤ 5.
Answer:
The missing reason is Subtraction Property of Equality.
Step-by-step explanation:
⇒ (Given)
On Solving we get;
Multiplying 2 on both side we get;
⇒ (Multiplication Property of Equality)
Now Subtracting Both side by 10 we get;
⇒ (Subtraction Property of Equality)
Now Dividing both side by 3 we get;
⇒ (Division Property of Equality)
Hence the missing reason is Subtraction Property of Equality.
Answer:
8) answer=5 9)answer=15
Step-by-step explanation:
all you have to do is replace in the following formula
Where
X1: is the first number of the first point
Y1: is the second number of the first point
X2: is the first number of the second point
Y2: is the second number of the second point
you replace in the formula and solve
I attach solution
When we make it into a common denominator, find a common multiple between the denominators. For this instance, it is
3/4=9/12
2/3=8/12
When we see it with a common denominator, 3/4 is bigger than 2/3.
Answer:
p> -4
Step-by-step explanation:
3p + 2 > -10
3p > -10 -2
p> -4
