Answer:
It is true, that in a management information system, the quality of information is determined by its usefulness to users, and its usefulness determines the success of the information system.
Explanation:
A management information system (MIS) is a computerized and centralized database that collects data from many different resources in the organization. And, then processes and organized the data in a way that would be useful and helpful in making a business decision. These days, for both large and small organization, collection of data and use of technology are so prevalent and these organization collecting the data from their businesses resources daily even hourly such as daily sale, daily expense, hourly wages, etc, and then managing it in a way to make a right business decision. A good MIS in an organization gives a competitive advantage because it turns the data into usable and into helpful information that can be used in making business decisions and strategy and to increase profit.
However, the information quality is based on its usefulness to the user or to the organization. Because if the MIS produces the information that is not useful to the user, the information and use of MIS are useless in the organization because the information that is required in making a business decision is not useful.
If the MIS produces the quality information to its user in making the right business decision and organization or user take the right decision that brings profit to the organization. Then, this use of information determines the success of an information system in an organization.
For example:
In a Bakery, the MIS produce the right information in making decision e.g. MIS produce information to bakery owner that on valentine day, most people buy chocolate. Then, the owner tries to meet the demand for chocolate on valentine's day. Therefore, this is the quality of information and it is determined by its usefulness to the bakery owner and its usefulness determines the success of MIS.
B. To sell it as a product
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
<span>An attribute in a relation of a database that serves as the primary key of another relation in the same database is called a</span>
