The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be PRIVATE BRAND. <span>Equate, a brand of health and beauty care products, is available only at Walmart stores. Equate is a private brand. Other choices for this question include manufacturer's, international, family and corporate. Hope this helps.</span>
Answer:
Cash outflow will be $1300
So option (C) will be correct answer
Explanation:
We have given overhead expense = $2000 per month
Depreciation expenses = $500
And allocated insurance expense = $200
So non cash expense = depreciation expense + allocated insurance expense = $500+$200 = $700
We have to fond the cash out flow
Cash outflow is equal to = Overhead expense - non cash expense = $2000 - $700 = $1300
So cash outflow will be $1300
So option (C) will be correct answer
Dave is an individual with an <u>"Internal locus of control".</u>
Locus of control is a person's belief system with respect to the reasons for his or her encounters and the components to which that individual characteristics achievement or disappointment.
In the event that a man has an internal locus of control, that individual credits accomplishment to his or her own endeavors and capacities. A man who hopes to succeed will be more roused and more inclined to learn.
Psychological research has discovered that individuals with a more internal locus of control appear to be in an ideal situation, e.g. they have a tendency to be greater accomplishment situated and show signs of improvement paying employments.
Answer:
Countries become better at making the product they specialize in. Consumer benefits: Specialization means that the opportunity cost of production is lower, which means that globally more goods are produced and prices are lower. Consumers benefit from these lower prices and greater quantity of goods.
Explanation:
Nate finds the language of the contract to buy bedroom furniture difficult to understand due to "procedural unconscionability".
<h3>What is
procedural unconscionability?</h3>
Unconscionability that results from the contract-making process rather than from a contract's terms that are inherently unfair or unreasonable
Examples of Procedural Unconscionability is-
- influencing an underprivileged party who would not have otherwise signed the contract to do so.
- minimising important clauses in contracts for the sake of the underdog.
- If one side uses threats of violence against the other party, his family, or friends, this is known as coercion.
Therefore, Procedural unconscionability is based on elements that deprive a party of a meaningful choice, such as customer ignorance or a significant amount of unclear fine print.
To know more about elements required in contract-making, here
brainly.com/question/8116487
#SPJ4
