The answer is c and that comes from personal experience
IAnswer:
Im not sure how well this use of the information will help you but,
Source: "<em>In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba, in response to certain actions taken by the Cuban government and directed the Department of Commerce and the Treasury to implement the embargo, which remains in place today. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba, in response to certain actions taken by the Cuban Government, and directed the Departments of Commerce and the Treasury to implement the embargo, which remains in place today. Beyond criticisms of human rights in Cuba, the United States holds $6 billion worth of financial claims against the Cuban government. The pro-embargo position is that the U.S. embargo is, in part, an appropriate response to these unaddressed claims."</em>
Paraphrasing - In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy announced an Associate in Nursing embargo on trade between U. S. and Cuba, in response to sure actions taken by the Cuban government, and directed the Department of Commerce and therefore the Treasury to implement the embargo. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy announced an Associate in Nursing embargo on trade between u. s. and Cuba, in response to sure actions taken by the Cuban government, and directed the Department of Commerce and therefore the Treasury to implement the embargo, that remains in situ these days. on the far side of criticisms of human rights in Cuba, the U.S. holds a $6 billion value of economic claims against the Cuban government. The pro-embargo position is that the U.S. embargo is, in part, Associate in Nursing applicable response to those unaddressed claims.
Explanation:
The "source" is the information where i got it from and the "paraphrased" part is fully rewritten, ps sorry if it's a bit long and wordy! hope this helps have a great day :)
Answer: The Lincoln Memorial
Although Scopes wasn’t about teaching the subject of evolution, he incriminated himself on purpose anyway so the case would have a defendant.
