Something not to consider when trying to get a positive return on investment (ROI) for higher education is: c. the type of food that is offered on the meal plan.
<h3>What is rate of return?</h3>
Rate of return can be defined as a net gain (profit) or loss that is associated with an investment over a specified period of time, and it's usually expressed as a percentage of the investment's initial cost.
This ultimately implies that, the rate of return must be higher than the rate of inflation in order for any business firm or individual to earn money on their investments.
Also, a positive return on investment (ROI) entails a net gain (profit) from an investment over a specified period of time. This ultimately implies that, the type of food that is offered on the meal plan isn't something to consider when trying to get a positive return on investment (ROI) for higher education.
Read more on return on investment here: brainly.com/question/23603222
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Which of these is not something to consider when trying to get a positive return on investment (ROI) for higher education?
a. The cost of attendance.
b. The financial aid package that is offered to you.
c. The type of food that is offered on the meal plan.
d. Your expected career income.
Answer:
Oscar Lewis’s "culture of poverty" is usually interpreted as blaming the poor people for being poor. It's like, you are poor because you decide to be poor, and Cho (and I) believe that it is not true.
While Mario Luis Small believed that someone doesn't have or belongs to a culture just because his or her race, ethnic group or gender. His work relates to how environmental, socio-cultural conditions influence poor neighborhoods and their residents.
Answer:
He must report 15,000 gain in his year 8 tax...........
<span>No, specific performance is not allowed in this case because money damages are available.
In case that a party failed to fulfill the condition that signed on the contract, the court could give 1 of 2 form of punishments.
The first is to forcibly make that party perform the condition (specific performance), the other is to pay back the loss that incurred because of that party fail to fulfill the condition (money damages)</span>
Options:
- Smith Bus should be excused from performance under the clause for the rights on improper delivery
- Smith Bus should not be excused from performance because it did not act in good faith
- Smith Bus should be excused from performance under the test of commercial impracticability
- Smith Bus can exercise its right of anticipatory repudiation
Answer:
Correct answer is Option c.
<u>Smith Bus should be excused from performance under the test of commercial impracticability
</u>
Explanation:
In this case, Smith cannot fulfil the contract obligation due to an unforeseen event. Hence, Commercial impracticability shall apply.
