All categories

3 years ago

Acceleration of a runner who goes from 1.4 m/s to 2.2 m/s in 4 s

Mathematics

1 answer:

N76 [4]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

acceleration is 0.2m/s²

Step-by-step explanation:

Vf=Vi+at

Lets susbtitute our known variables into the equation

2.2=1.4+a(4)

We get

a=0.2m/s²

You might be interested in

Line l is a perpendicular bisector of line segment A C. It intersects line segment A C at point B. Line l also contains points D

N76 [4]

Answer:

First one is DC

Second one is AB.

Step-by-step explanation:

Just did them on edge.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 3 more answers

F(x) = x2 + 1 g(x) = 5-x (f+g)(x) = O x2 + x-4 x²+x+4 O x2-x+6 O x2 + x + 6

charle [14.2K]

Answer:

$\boxed{(f + g)(x) = {x}^{2} - x + 6}$

Given:

$f(x) = {x}^{2} + 1 \\ \\ g(x) = 5 - x$

To Find:

$(f + g)(x) = f(x) + g(x)$

Step-by-step explanation:

$= > f(x) + g(x) = ({x}^{2} + 1) + (5 - x) \\ \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = {x}^{2} + 1 + 5 - x\\ \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = {x}^{2} + 6 - x\\ \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = {x}^{2} - x + 6$

5 0

3 years ago

1. Gummy worms are $3.50 per pound

Alexxandr [17]

The constant of proportionality is 3.50 since gummy worms are sold at the same rate per pound.

3.50x, equation
3.50(2.5) = $8.75 for 2.5 pounds

3 0

3 years ago

In 1943, an organization surveyed 1100 adults and asked, "Are you a total abstainer from, or do you on occasion consume, alc

Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

We conclude that the proportion of adults who totally abstain from alcohol has changed.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that in 1943, an organization surveyed 1100 adults and asked, "Are you a total abstainer from, or do you on occasion consume, alcoholic beverages?"

Of the 1100 adults surveyed, 429 indicated that they were total abstainers. In a recent survey, the same question was asked of 1100 adults and 352 in

Let p = proportion of adults who totally abstain from alcohol.

where, p = $\frac{429}{1100}$ = 0.39

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : p = 39% {means that the proportion of adults who totally abstain from alcohol has not changed}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : p $\neq$ 39% {means that the proportion of adults who totally abstain from alcohol has changed}

The test statistics that would be used here One-sample z proportion statistics;

T.S. = $\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p$ = sample proportion of adults who totally abstain from alcohol = $\frac{352}{1100}$ = 0.32

n = sample of adults surveyed = 1100

So, test statistics = $\frac{0.32-0.39}{\sqrt{\frac{0.32(1-0.32)}{1100} } }$

= -4.976

The value of z test statistics is -4.976.

Now, at 0.10 significance level the z table gives critical values of -1.645 and 1.645 for two-tailed test.

Since our test statistics doesn't lie within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the proportion of adults who totally abstain from alcohol has changed.

4 0

3 years ago

I need this by tomorrow night 3/14/2017.

photoshop1234 [79]

Today is 3/14/17 and where is the content at

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers