Answer:
Congress was unable to regulate interstate and foreign commerce; some states refused to pay for goods they purchased from abroad. Congress was unable to impose taxes; it could only borrow money on credit. No national court system was established to protect the rights of U.S. citizens.
Explanation:
Aside
from SAPS, The government has established National Anti-Corruption Forum which
aims to:
<span>·
</span>Prevent
and fight corruption
<span>·
</span>Upgrade
protection for whistleblowers and witnesses
<span>·
</span>Blacklisting
the corrupt individuals and businesses
<span>·
</span>Upgrade
management policies and practices
<span>·
</span>Sustain
professional ethics
<span>·
</span><span>Stakeholder
partnerships</span>
None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
The actual answer is the <em><u>corpus callosum</u></em> hope this helps :)
