Until we have sufficient data to say otherwise, we presumptively reject the null hypothesis. There are just two results that can arise from a hypothesis test. You reject the null hypothesis when your p-value is less than or equal to your significance level.
<h3>What is the experiment's null hypothesis?</h3>
The null hypothesis asserts that there is no correlation between the variables of interest. You want to determine if there is a correlation between height and gender. You come up with the hypothesis that men are typically taller than women based on your understanding of human physiology.
<h3>How is a hypothesis test carried out?</h3>
To conduct a hypothesis test, we must first and foremost determine the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. The following gives an example of the null and alternative hypothesis: Step 2: The next thing we must do is determine the relevance level. Its value is typically 0.05 or 0.01
Learn more about null hypothesis:
brainly.com/question/11841529
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Anti Fed is the false one
Explanation:
it just is
I’m pretty sure they were made slaves
Answer:
World War 1
Explanation:
WW1 just ended in 1918, and the US had just come out victorious.
Answer:
The correct answer is a. Humphreys used license plate numbers to target their homes and interview the men without disclosing the real subject of his study.
Explanation:
Laud Humphreys (1930-1988) was a sociologist who for his PhD dissertation wrote a study called <em>Tearoom Trade</em> (1968), where he studied the behavior of males who engaged in homosexual sex in public toilets. Humphreys made a series of discoveries, like finding out that most of the men who engaged in these practices were not openly or overtly homosexual, and even a majority of them (54%) were married. However, his research was widely criticized because of how he performed it. Humphreys acted out as a sort of look-out for the men in the toilets, but without disclosing his identity as a researcher. Moreover, <u>Humphreys followed the unwitting subjects of his study to their homes by </u><u>tracking their license plate numbers and interviewed them</u><u>, posing as a government health officer and hiding his true identity as a sociologist conducting research</u>. Lying to subjects and hiding from them that they're part of a study is frowned upon by the scientific community, so the research was widely controversial, and it's still brought up as an example of the ethics of social research.
