1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alona [7]
2 years ago
14

ANSWER ASAP PLS

Mathematics
1 answer:
katrin [286]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

21/6 can be divided by 3, so 7/2

7/2 cannot be divided into any more shared factors, so final answer is 7:2.

You might be interested in
Which statements are true?
LenKa [72]

Answer:

All trapezoids are quadrilaterals

Step-by-step explanation:

Look it up it true

O~O

Roblox: Supertasticgg

Sub to Flamingo

7 0
3 years ago
What is the relationship between the following ordered pairs 0,6 2,5 4,4 and 6,3 keep in mind it will be a two step process
aliya0001 [1]
Find the first rate of change...

(5-6)/(2-0)=(4-5)/(4-2)=(3-4)/6-4)=-1/2

So this equation has a constant velocity which means that it is linear and can be expressed as y=mx+b where m=slope=velocity and b=y-intercept, value of y when x=0...we saw earlier that the velocity or slope is -1/2 so:

y=-x/2+b, and we can use any point to solve for b, I'll use (6,3)

3=-6/3+b

3=-2+b

b=5

So the relationship if the function:

y=-x/2+5  or more neatly...

y=(10-x)/2
5 0
3 years ago
Joey has $400 in a bank account that earns 8% in annual interest. Would this equation be Linear or Exponential?
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Exponential

The first year, he would earn 8% interest on the $400 deposited, so he'd have $432. The next year, he would earn 8% interest on the interest earned the previous year in addition to the amount deposited, so he'd have $466.56.

His bank balance would follow the compound interest equation which is exponential.

= 400 × 1.08^t

where t is the number of years since the deposit

3 0
3 years ago
34, 41, 25, 43, ? : mean of 38
Vesna [10]
I'm not sure what the question is but to get the mean you add up all the numbers and divide them by the amount of numbers there are.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which describes how square S could be transformed to square S prime in two steps? Assume that the center of dilation is the orig
gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

The correct option is;

A dilation by a scale factor of Two-fifths and then a translation of 3 units up

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the coordinates of the vertices of square S are

(0, 0), (5, 0), (5, -5), (0, -5)

Given that the coordinates of the vertices of square S' are

(0, 1), (0, 3), (2, 3), (2, 1)

We have;

Length of side, s, for square S is s = √((y₂ - y₁)² + (x₂ - x₁)²)

Where;

(x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂) are the coordinates of two consecutive vertices

When (x₁, y₁) = (0, 0) and (x₂, y₂) = (5, 0), we have;

s = √((y₂ - y₁)² + (x₂ - x₁)²) = s₁ = √((0 - 0)² + (5 - 0)²) = √(5)² = 5

For square S', where (x₁, y₁) = (0, 1) and (x₂, y₂) = (0, 3)

Length of side, s₂, for square S' is s₂ = √((3 - 1)² + (0 - 0)²) = √(2)² = 2

Therefore;

The transformation of square S to S' involves a dilation of s₂/s₁ = 2/5

The after the dilation (about the origin),  the coordinates of S becomes;

(0, 0) transformed to (remains at) (0, 0) ....center of dilation

(5, 0) transformed to (5×2/5, 0) = (2, 0)

(5, -5) transformed to (2, -2)

(0, -5) transformed to (0, -2)

Comparison of (0, 0), (2, 0), (2, -2), (0, -2) and (0, 1), (0, 3), (2, 3), (2, 1) shows that the orientation is the same;

For (0, 0), (2, 0), (2, -2), (0, -2) we have;

(0, 0), (2, 0) the same y-values, (∴parallel to the x-axis)

(2, -2), (0, -2) the same y-values, (∴parallel to the x-axis)

For (0, 1), (0, 3), (2, 3), (2, 1) we have;

(0, 3), (2, 3) the same y-values, (∴parallel to the x-axis)

(0, 1), (2, 1) the same y-values, (∴parallel to the x-axis)

Therefore, the lowermost point closest to the y-axis in (0, 0), (2, 0), (2, -2), (0, -2) which is (0, -2) is translated to the lowermost point closest to the y-axis in (0, 1), (0, 3), (2, 3), (2, 1) which is (0, 1)

That is (0, -2) is translated to (0, 1) which shows that the translation is T((0 - 0), (1 - (-2)) = T(0, 3) or 3 units up

The correct option is therefore a dilation by a scale factor of Two-fifths and then a translation of 3 units up.

7 1
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Add fractions with unlike denominators 2/3+2/4
    7·2 answers
  • What type(s) of symmetry does this figure have?
    11·2 answers
  • Answer these Please
    7·1 answer
  • What is the complement of 11 degrees
    10·2 answers
  • Can someone please check out those questions?
    15·2 answers
  • How could I simplify 3/215<br> In the lowest turms
    5·1 answer
  • At the start of the summer, you have $603.15 in the bank. You make deposits of $90.89 in June, $106.03 in July, and $70.04 in Au
    14·1 answer
  • I need help with this question, thanks!
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following phrases are equations? Choose 2 answers:
    8·1 answer
  • If HF=4x+9, EF = 5x+3 , and EF is perpendicular to HF, solve for x.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!