I have no idea what you're talking about. Can you explain in detail plz?
Answer: k=-6
-6=k+0
Step-by-step explanation:
Rise over run would be a thing to start with since you use graphs<span />
Answer:
m∠P = 70°, m∠T = 20°, m∠SKP = 40° , and m∠MKT = 70°
Step-by-step explanation:
* Lets explain how to solve the problem
- In Δ PST
∵ m∠S = 90°
∴ m∠T + m∠P = 90° ⇒ interior angles of a triangle
∵ m∠SPK/m∠KPT = 5/2
- The ratio between the two angles are 5 : 2 , multiply the parts of the
ratio by x, where x is a real number
∴ m∠SPK = 5x
∴ m∠KPT = 2x
∵ m∠SPK + m∠KPT = m∠P
∴ m∠P = 5x + 2x = 7x
- In ΔPKT
∵ KM ⊥ PT
∵ MP = Mt
∴ KM is perpendicular bisector of PT
∴ ΔPKT is an isosceles triangle with KP = KT
∵ KP = KT
∴ m∠KPT = m∠T
∵ m∠KPT = 2x
∴ m∠T = 2x
∵ m∠T + m∠P = 90°
∵ m∠P = 7x
∵ m∠T = 2x
∴ 2x + 7x = 90 ⇒ solve for x
∴ 9x = 90 ⇒ divide both sides by 9
∴ x = 10
∵ m∠P = 7x
∴ m∠P = 7(10) = 70°
∴ m∠P = 70°
∵ m∠T = 2x
∴ m∠T = 2(10) = 20°
∴ m∠T = 20°
- In ΔSKP
∵ m∠S = 90°
∵ m∠SPK = 5x = 5(10) = 50°
∴ m∠SKP = 180° - (90° + 50°) = 180° - 140° = 40° ⇒ interior angles of a Δ
∴ m∠SKP = 40°
- In Δ KMT
∵ m∠KMT = 90°
∵ m∠T = 20°
∴ m∠MKT = 180° - (90° + 20°) = 180° - 110° = 70° ⇒ interior angles of a Δ
∴ m∠MKT = 70°
No it's not a reasonable conclusion. Correlation does not lead to causation. If two variables are linked, then they may affect one another or there may be another set of factors involved. There isn't enough info to know for sure. The fact that r = -0.7 is fairly close to r = -1 indicates there's moderately strong negative correlation, but I don't think it's strong enough in my opinion. More research is needed.
In short, the keyword "caused" as part of the claim is what makes it unreasonable. There is no way to know that not eating vegetables leads to high blood pressure. It may be true but again, more info is needed.
