I hate dividing fractions but I think -2/16 off of my best hunch.
Answer:
a: 0.1%
b. No it does not
c. Probably for safety reasons
Step-by-step explanation:
for women: z = (55.9 - 63.9)/3.6 = -2.22
The p-value for z = -2.22 is 0.0132, so only 1.32% of women could walk through without bending
for men: z = (55.9 - 69.7)/3.6 = -3.83
The p-value for z = -3.83 is 0.001, so only 0.1% of men could walk through without bending
Answer:
$ 500
Step-by-step explanation:
Básicamente divides 125 entre 2 (para saber el precio de la mensualidad, asumiendo que no hay descuentos) y luego ese resultado lo multiplicamos por 8, ya que es la cantidad de meses que nos interesa pagar (no se hace por 6 porque en ninguna parte dice que ya ha pagado esos 2 meses)
Well this is very pretty thing and i love it
No, they cannot be determined as congruent.
The SAS rule of congruency requires that two sides and the angle BETWEEN them are congruent. However, the angle between them is not specified as congruent.
There exists no SSA (side-side-angle) rule of congruency that would help prove the pair of triangles congruent. Thus, we have insufficient information to determine them as congruent.
