They settled around the Mediterranean and Black sea, which helped spread culture.
An illustration of a sound general business philosophy is to prioritize the triple bottom line by acting ethically toward the organization's stakeholders and the environment.
<h3>
What are the objectives of the triple bottom line?</h3>
TBL is devoted to concentrating on the following strategic goals:
To work together on the government's national five-year development plans (FYDP III) with other stakeholders to promote an environment that is conducive to socio-economic growth.
Five Essential Business Rules:
- Leadership
- Perception
- Vision
- Reputation
- Consistency
Hence, The triple bottom line hypothesis broadens the definition of business success indicators to take into account contributions to social, economic, and environmental well-being.
Learn more about the triple bottom line:
brainly.com/question/5617781
#SPJ1
Answer:
<h3>Legally insane.</h3>
Explanation:
A court may declare a defendant legally insane if he/she pass a series of insanity tests. It includes the "M'Naghten Rule" test, the "Irresistible Impulse" Test,The "Durham Rule" and The "Model Penal Code" Test for Legal Insanity.
A court may allow an insanity defense if the defendant can prove to the court that he/she did not understand what they did, failed to understand right from wrong, was unable to control impulse due to mental disease or some other factors which resulted from mental instability.
Answer:
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[5]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[6] For instance if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have; they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[7] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[8] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[9]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[10] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[11]
Explanation:
plzz mark me as brainlist
<span>Therefore, Peter was demonstrating an "affect blend."
</span>
Affect blend alludes to an outward appearance in which one part of the face is enrolling one feeling and another piece of the face is enlisting an alternate feeling. In short we can say that it is facial expressions uncovering at least two feelings at the same time.
