Answer:
Part-to-whole relationship- city: state – state : country.
Item-category relationship- St. Bernard : dog – eagle : bird.
Cause and effect relationship- sliver : pain – heat : boil.
Explanation:
The different categorization of relationships determines the connection of the items or elements to each other. And it also helps organize them and understand their analogical position.
In the given examples, the city, state, and country constitute the <u>part-to-whole relationship</u>. This is because the city is a part of the state, which is, in turn, a part of the country.
The<u> item-category relationship</u> is shown in St. Bernard and eagle, where they are categorized according to their belonging. St. Bernard belonging to the dog category and the eagle to a bird presents the item-category relationship.
And the <u>cause and effect relationship</u> is seen in the relationship of the "sliver: pain" and "heat: boil" pairs. They present the cause and effect of that cause.
It’s B or C sorry if am wrong
So sorry but where is the book
Hmm...I'm not really sure as to what your question refers to. Maybe rephrase it a little so it's easier to understand? =)
The implicit meaning in the line "now I'm someone who watches tractor pulls on obscure cable channels" is that, though an Indian immigrant, in some ways she feels very integrated into American society. The main contextual clue in the line is "tractor pulls" because tractor pulling is a kind of competition that one would not think is popular in India, but it is kind of motorsport competition that is popular in the United States. The fact that the speaker is watching this competitions on cable channels lets the reader know that she has adopted some american cultural customs.
