Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
Since January of 2009, Barack H. Obama has been President of the US.
If he remains physically and mentally able, and doesn't resign the position,
he will remain in office until the winner of the November 2016 Presidential
election is inaugurated in January of 2017.
Answer:
Has higher emotional competence than most men
Explanation:
<u>This is because her nature, or "gift", allows her to naturally know how a person feels when she sees them</u> and use that private information to help them overcome the situations they may be going through or help she can help them by teaching them how to control those emotions and channel them for a good use.
<u>Emotional intelligence is when a person knows their emotions and puts them to good use</u>, in this example, Erandi has very high emotional intelligence and uses it to help people achieve a greater level of emotional intelligence themselves.
Answer:
The correct answer is: because residents are constantly moving in and out of the neighborhood
Explanation:
According to psychological research conducted in the psychology areas of community psychology, for communities to establish personal long-lasting relationships between the individuals that form such communities, they have to first create a sense of common goal and shared community identity.
To establish that identity, one of the most important factors is frequency. When people hardly interact, or if every time a person from the community moves out of the neighborhood, the sense of unity dissolves, and therefore, common goals, personal relationships and communication fades away.
In conclusion, to the question: Why are personal relationships, including establishing communication and common goals, strained in socially disorganized neighborhoods? The correct answer is: because residents are constantly moving in and out of the neighborhood.
