Please give me answer choices and i will be glad to help.
Answer:
Explanation below
Explanation:
What I think is that the teacher was doing it without all seriousness. Because, if it took it serious he/she would have melted out the same position with the same duration to the students.
I think the teacher should have warned them and told them to punish them if the action is repeated.
No. They will be silent for the period of the punishment and resume to the immediately they are released.
Answer: Yes
Explanation: The grocery had the duty to use due care to stay its premises during a reasonably safe condition for invitees or to warn them of a hazard. Whether a condition constitutes a danger may be a function of reasonableness. That is, if the ordinarily prudent man could foresee that harm was a possible results of a condition, then it's a danger. the shop knew or should have known that water was present and continuing to accumulate on the ground, and that they negligently did not remove the water.
The first focus must be on finding the cause of the fire.
Tamam çok güzel da bu kadar basit mi görüyorsun
