Answer:
Mrs.Smith should continue to operate the business in the short run but shut down in the long run.
Explanation:
According to the shut down rule, at the profit-maximizing positive level of output, a business in a competitive market should continue to operate in the short-term if the price equals to or is greater than the average variable cost, but should shut down in the long term if the price is less than or equal to total cost. Here,
price = $8.10
avg variable cost = $8.00
avg total cost = $8.25
Mrs.Smith should continue to operate the business in the short run but shut down in the long run.
After using the format painter, he wants to turn it off. The key he should press is the Esc key. It is f<span>ound on most computer keyboards and used for any of various functions, as to interrupt or cancel the current process or running program, or to close a pop-up window.</span>
Answer:
retaliation.
Explanation:
Title VII of hte Civil rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination at work based on race, color, ethnic origin, gender, religion, etc. What the company was doing was wrong, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) should deal with this issue. But what they did to Hailey for complaining about the company's wrong deeds is twice as bad. The company not only keeps discriminating African American employees but also retaliates against Hailey for demanding something that is correct and legal.
Answer:
$5,697,674
Explanation:
Dividend Valuation method is used to value the operations of a company based on the dividend paid, its growth rate and rate of return/WACC. The price is calculated by calculating present value of future dividend payment.
Free cash flow is the residual cash flow of operation after paying the capital expenditure from net income of the company. It represent the cash from the operations.
Formula to calculate the value of operation
Value of Operations = FCF / ( WACC - growth rate )
Value of Operations = $490,000 / ( 13% - 4.4% )
Value of Operations = $5,697,674
McCulloch v. Maryland represented a power struggle between the State and Federal law. It was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The state of Maryland had attempted to impede operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. Though the law, by its language, was generally applicable to all banks not chartered in Maryland, the Second Bank of the United States was the only out-of-state bank then existing in Maryland, and the law was recognized in the court's opinion as having specifically targeted the U.S. Bank.
