1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shutvik [7]
3 years ago
7

Why would the Iroquois not care about getting a college education from the Europeans?

History
1 answer:
dybincka [34]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

The Iroquois did not care about getting a college education from the Europeans because they did not want to change their rich culture, history, beliefs, and traditions, which were so rooted in the teachings of their ancestors and the love for mother nature.

When white European colonists arrived in the Americas in early 1607, the King of England .for instance- ordered to instruct the Native American Indians into the Cristian religious teachings. What was known as evangelization.  Europeans saw the Native Indians as "savages," ignorant people that needed to be instructed.

That is why some colonists founded Harvard college in 1650 in Massachusetts. Missionary man John Eliot had n¿been the supporter behind this idea that never really wrorked.  

You might be interested in
How did the growth and development of railroads affect the American economy?
Sphinxa [80]
The best option will be the C. Railroads made the rapid movement of produce and goods into many markets possible.

Because Railroads basically were the key point to national business and economic growth. Eliminating the needs for long and weary trips, while also founding and fueling other soon-to-be huge business industries, such as iron, coal, copper, machinery, etc., railroads made "rapid movement of produce and goods into many markets possible."
5 0
3 years ago
A ruler could lose the "mandate of heaven" if he or she
levacccp [35]
A) it was a sign that the ruler  was not virtuous
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
President Carter or President Ford? He was virtually unknown when he ran for office, but he was appealing to U.S. citizens becau
ad-work [718]
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "President Carter." He was virtually unknown when he ran for office, but he was appealing to U.S. citizens because he promised to never <span>lie to them. This statement, President Carter was being referred to.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain un
Lady bird [3.3K]

This past weekend marked the 234th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.  And while much has changed since the signers met in secret to dissolve the bands that tied them to England, their words are as true today as they have ever been. 


The preamble to the Declaration states:


<span>
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government …</span>

The arrangement of this statement reveals the founders’ belief that individual rights pre-exist the establishment of a government-- a radical notion at the time.  The Declaration begins, “We hold these truths to be self-evident…”  By referring to the aspects of the subsequent statement as "self-evident truths," the founders insist that they do not merely apply to colonists but rather that they are universal.  Included in these universal truths is the idea, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”  This bold assertion insists that no one life is more valuable than the next, and that—by virtue of sharing the same rights—no individual has the authority to rule over or oppress another.


Moreover, the equal rights shared by all humans are “unalienable.”  They cannot be taken away.  This is because they are granted not by any man or institution but rather they are “endowed” upon individuals by their Creator.  Only the One who grants rights has the authority to take them away.


Although the founders believed in the unalienable rights of every person, they also understood that there will always be forces in this world that seek to oppress.  Thus, “to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.”  Put simply, the government possesses no rights.  Its sole purpose is to protect the rights of its citizenry from outside forces.  If it fails in this duty, it is the responsibility of individuals to abolish it.


The writers of the Declaration—and subsequently the writers of the Constitution—believed that government’s power comes out of its ability to protect the rights of its people.  Individuals do not receive natural rights from government and thus government does not have the authority to take rights away.  To the extent that it protects individual rights, government operates legitimately.  However, when it fails to protect such rights or when it imposes upon them, it becomes an illegitimate ruler over what would otherwise be free people.


When the founding fathers gathered in 1776, they did not merely declare the independence of the colonies from their British oppressors.  They declared the independence of all individuals from the unlawful intrusion of overreaching government.  And that declaration forever altered the course of human history.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain una
Alik [6]

Answer:

The third sentence is a clear example of the concept of social contract.

Explanation:

The idea of social contract became important during the Enlightenment because it established that the power lies in the people and not in the figurehead of government.  The French writer Rousseau is one of the Enlightenment thinkers that popularized the term.  This concept goes on to explain that if the government is not serving its people and is not acting in the people's best interest, then the people have the right to remove it and place a new government in its place.  This can clearly be seen in the third sentence.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A ship was caught in a storm and driven to a small island in the middle of the south pacific. for generations, no one encountere
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following became states out of the land acquired by the Louisiana purchase?
    15·2 answers
  • What steps did the United States take in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001?
    9·2 answers
  • Until the mid 1900s most of the Chinese cities were
    6·1 answer
  • What city did Edward R. Murrow report from during World War II?
    12·1 answer
  • When Solon ushered in reforms establishing a supreme court and limiting the nobles' landownership, he planted the seeds for:
    12·2 answers
  • Select all that apply.
    13·2 answers
  • How did US labor unions treat Chinese immigrants in the 1800s?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following description describes the domino effect in relation to the us policy in Indochina during cold war
    11·1 answer
  • Who colonized Brazil?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!