Answer:
All options apply to the question because each one reflects one side of technology in relation to the artist's case (that could be a software engineer or a even a hardware designer).
Explanation:
Letter a applies to the question in terms of computer program's behavior with no people's assistance, which is something not real for the present time, although it is easy to imagine that it is going to be a reality in a near future for all the improvements engineers and developers have made. Letter b also applies because computers and softwares have become one of the most important tools for artists around the world, whether for researching and/or for sharing and/or selling their productions, however it is a radical idea to think an artist is not necessary anymore, that is similiar to say human beings are not necessary only because machines have improved. Letter c also applies to the question for all improvements made in art and art forms after all improvements made in technology and tools for technologies development. And, letter d also applies because computers may be used for studying and/or working, which is the perfect tool for a workplace, and this is why it has become essential in many organizations, companies, subsidiaries, agencies, schools, and more.
Credit cards do charge the most interest
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
Answer:
a) 0.843 years
b) 1.785 years
Explanation:
See attached pictures for detailed explanation.
The Canterbury Tales, written towards the end of the fourteenth century by Geoffrey Chaucer, is considered an estates satire because it effectively criticizes, even to the point of parody, the main social classes of the time. These classes were referred to as the three estates, the church, the nobility, and the peasantry, which for a long time represented the majority of the population.