Answer:
D is the answer. If this answer is wrong then tell me and I will remove this answer.
Explanation:
Most animals protect there home from other animals.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide options or any other reference, we can say the following.
The cosmological argument relies on what many (but not all) philosophers accept as a basic metaphysical principle that accepts the principle of one great creator of the universe. Many times called god, this "unknown entity" is the one that set things in motion in the cosmos. This particular or magical entity, under the natural theology vision, is the force behind everything in the universe, and this tries to confirm the existence of one creator god.
The great awakening allowed for new ideas to arise like how we use to see the world as the earth being the center of the universe we are able to establish our own ideas on what is actually the center of the universe and be more open minded to those and accepting as well as new religions and inventions that we wouldn’t have here today if it wasn’t for the great awakening theorist
<span>Option (c) is the most correct. With this argument, a person has free will only because he or she is aware that they do every time they make a conscious decision to do something. The free will is only recognized after the action has taken place.</span>
The correct answer is: "Unexpected, related or possible related to the research, suggests the research puts subjects or others at greater risk"
The OHRP defines an unticipated problem in the scenario of a research involving human participants. Defining the problem as unanticipated means that it was not foreseen at all when detailing the possible risks for the parcipants of the study on when those were asked to sign a consent form. It is also unanticipated in the sense that the problem which have aroused does not match in terms of likelihood with the characteristics of the specific individual suffering it.
Such term does not refer to some inconvenience with minimum consequences, but it suggest that the problem occurring affects the research subjects or others and places them at a greater risk of harm - physical, psychological, economic ,etc.- than was anticipated before the research.
