The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
It first started with the Pearl Harbor Attack and was officially announced by Roosevelt in the Quarantine Speech.
Answer:
I think it is C an increase in acid rain my apologies if I am wrong
Native Americans in North America established themselves in 10 separate culture areas: the Arctic, the Subarctic, the Northeast, the Southeast, the Plains, the
Southwest, the Great Basin, California, the Northwest Coast and the
Plateau. They established themselves according to the type of landscape or terrain and weather they have.
