Answer:
No, it shouldn't. In the present case, it is a conflict of interest between two states: the states of New York and New Jersey, with respect to Ellis Island and the inter-jurisdictional waters of the Hudson River. Therefore, due to being a controversial matter between two states, the provisions of Article III Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which establishes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the case. In addition, in case of recourse to the internal courts of a state, a state would be brought to litigate outside its original jurisdiction.
The statements accurately describe key compromises reached at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 :
The Three-Fifths Compromise established that the population of enslaved people in a state would be only partially represented in that state’s official population.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, established that Congress would be composed of one house in which representation was based on a state’s size and one in which every state was represented equally.
Option : B and C.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Constitutional Convention is a major event that took place in 1787. It decided that how America will be governed in future days. Moreover, it ratified by all the 13 states and resulted in three major compromises. They are Three-Fifths compromise, Great compromise, and Electoral College.
Firstly, the Great compromise ended the issue between the states regarding the representation of members in both houses.
Secondly, the Three-Fifths made the enslaved person's representation to be calculated as three-fifths of the white person in the House of representatives.
Finally, the electoral college resolved how the president can be elected.
Answer:
well
Explanation:
If they are not careful the results can be wrong and they might mess up the evidence. The evidence is so critical to what ever they have to solve. Again tho, The results can also be wrong, and they could mess up something really bad.
Yeah woman need those items they are an necessity
Answer:
The correct answer is B. states can rely on the federal government to protect them if needed.
Explanation:
This means that if a state has issues whether from across the border or domestic that the federal government will protect them. For example, if there are massive riots or forest fires or similar thing, the federal government will help pay for reconstruction of infrastructure or they will send the national guard to help with riots.
