9514 1404 393
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
The given formula is the "explicit" formula for the sequence.
The recursive formula would be ...
a[1] = 160
a[n] = 1/2·a[n-1] . . . . each term expressed in as a function of previous terms
The given statement is false.
OK so here it goes:
1a. 10³
1b. 10²
1c. 10(tiny 6)
1d. 10³
1e. 10(tiny6)
1f. 10(tiny 5)
2a. 400
2b. 640,000
2c. 5,400
2d. 5,301,000
2e. is it multipcation or addition
2f. 607,200
2g. 0.948
2h. 0.0094
3a) 0.02, 0.2, 2, 20, 200, 2000
3b) 3,400,000 ; 34,000; 340, 3.4, 0.034
3c) 85,700; 8,570; 857, 85.7, 8.57, 0.857
3d) 444, 4440, 44,400; 440,000; 4,400,000; 44,000,000
3e) 0.95, 9.5, 950, 95,000; 950,000; 9,500,000
Hope this helps.
Answer:
Follows are the explanation to the given question:
Step-by-step explanation:
Its determination of inventory amounts for various products. Its demand is an excellent illustration of a dynamic optimization model used in my businesses. Throughout this case, its store has restrictions within this room are limited. There are only 100 bottles of beverages to be sold, for instance, so there is a market restriction that no one can sell upwards of 50 plastic cups, 30 power beverages, and 40 nutritional cokes. Throughout this situation, these goods, even the maximum quantity supplied is 30, 18, and 28. The profit for each unit is $1, $1.4, and $0.8, etc. With each form of soft drink to also be calculated, a linear extra value is thus necessary.
Answer:
9 3/4 cups of sugar
Step-by-step explanation:
