The missing justification in Julia's angle proof is; Corresponding Angles Theorem
<h3>What is the angle theorem used?</h3>
We know that m∠AGE ≅ m∠HGB because they have congruent angles and are vertical angles.
Similarly, m∠HGB ≅ m∠CHE are alternate interior angles because two congruent angles on the inner side of the parallel lines are formed by a transversal.
In the diagram, m∠AGE ≅ m∠CHE would have to be corresponding Angles Theorem because parallel lines cut by a transversal would create congruent corresponding angles. That means a pair of angles on the same side of one of two lines that is cut by a transversal and on the same side of the transversal.
Read more about Angle theorem at; brainly.com/question/24839702
#SPJ1
Answer:
lol
Step-by-step explanation:
lollololol
llllllllllllllllllllllllooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllll
Answer:
Angle z makes a 180° angle when added to the angle of 124° in the first image, because they are on the same side of a straight line. Just subtract 124 from 180. =56 For the second picture, angle m will be the same as angle z because of the properties involved.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: get it I guess
Step-by-step explanation:
16 because one eighth is 2 and if u times 2 by 8 because it’s one eighth then u have 16
