Answer:
d.avoidance conditioning
Explanation:
The options for this question are missing. The options are:
a.anxiety conditioning.
b.operant conditioning.
c.reward conditioning.
d.avoidance conditioning
In psychology and conditioning, avoidance conditioning refers to the learning that occurs when the person learns some behavior because it prevents the appearance of some negative stimulus. In other words they behave in order to avoid a punishment or a negative feeling.
In this example, Alexis wants to eat a cookie out of the cookie jar but she remembers how mad her mother got at her when she did so last week and she feels anxious so she doesn't eat the cookie this time. <u>Alexis is behaving in order to avoid a negative stimulus (her mom getting angry at her)</u> and thus this is an example of avoidance conditioning.
Hm, I think the question here calls for "d", although d would be better defined as a focus on one's own culture, and ignoring other cultures, or seeing other cultures through the lense of own culture.
In a way, prejudice could be a good lead, but only if it said "prejudice towards all other cultures" which is not really feasible (one can't know all other cultures).
so, still, d is best, although there can be ethnocentrism without feeling superior
The correct answer is the Foremen Tab.
The factory foremen are called or referred to as the Foremen Tab, since they drink Tab Cola, while they are singing. A Foreman is known as an individual, who supervises and directs a team or group of workers to do their work better. He is considered to be a worker as well.
Answer:
Their prediction could be misleading becuase it asumes that the existing trend will continue (extrapolation).
Explanation:
If the data is the following:
Age (months) 36 48 54 60 66
Height(months) 35 38 41 43 45
Answer:
Reactance.
Explanation:
This is simply explained the juror's motives and doings which directly tells that inadmissible evidence violates due process, and legal evidentiary standards dictate that a curative instruction is appropriate to minimize the risk that the jury is misled by the unacceptable information.
Psychologists posit that jurors are likely to follow the prescribed corrective action only if motivated and able to do so. Research shows that jurors do attempt to use information in a fair manner and to align their decisions with the judge’s instructions. However, juror motivation also may be affected by reactance resistance to a judge’s admonition when it is seen as constraining effective deliberation unless the judge can offer a clear and compelling reason as to why the information is unreliable or irrelevant to the case. Jurors may resist giving up information that they find probative.
