According to Prof. St. Clair, allowing Lehman Brothers to fail in 2008 breached the Fed's primary mandate, and worsened the financial crisis of 2008.
<h3>What caused the Lehman Brothers' failure?</h3>
The main cause of the failure of Lehman Brothers Investment Bank was its involvement in the subprime mortgage market.
Lehmann Brothers recorded unprecedented loss due to the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis.
The investment bank held onto large positions in subprime and other lower-rated mortgage tranches when securitizing the underlying mortgages.
Thus, according to Prof. St. Clair, allowing Lehman Brothers to fail in 2008 was a terrible decision because its failure breached the Fed's primary mandate, and worsened the financial crisis of 2008.
Learn more about Lehman Brothers' Failure at brainly.com/question/7550583
#SPJ1
Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Completed units during June = 65,000 units
Ending inventory units = 7,000 units
Beginning inventory units = 4,000 units
Number of material equivalent units of production in the June 30:
= Completed units during June + Ending inventory units - Beginning inventory units
= 65,000 units + 7,000 units - 4,000 units
= 68,000 units
Therefore, the number of material equivalent units of production is 68,000 units.
Answer:
Situation 1 is a probably contingency. This recall is occurring and can be estimated as costing $2 million. This amount should be charge to the warranties payable and warranties expense accounts.
Date
Particulars
Ref.no
Debit $
Credit $
Warrantee expenses
20,00,000
Warranty payable account
20,00,000
[To record the estimated claims]
Comment
Step 3 of 3
Situation 2 is a reasonable contingency. The costs are possible and there are rough estimates for cleanup but there are also rough estimates about reimbursements for property damage. This situation would be disclosed on the balance sheet.
Situation 3 is a remote contingency. There is a small change that there could be property damage but there is no way to determine how much or what the costs could be. There is no amount marked down for this situation
Explanation:
Answer: Transactional leadership
Explanation:
Transactional leadership a style of leadership that grounded in the exchange relationship between the leader and the follower.
For transactional Leadership, promotion of compliance is done through both rewards and punishment.
