Answer: Blaming the victim
Explanation: In terms of psychology, blaming the victim is the act in which victim is accounted for their hardship and suffering. The offender of the crime is not considered faulty for the act rather victim is held responsible due to victim's behavior and actions , persisting prejudice against the sufferer .
As per the case in the question , Martha's friend is blaming Martha for getting mugged and thus, blaming the victim. Her friend is making Martha the faulty person in the case by considering she should have known about risk in walking down that road at night and she stating that she had misfortune.
The liberty interest and the right to die and to seek assistance in exercising the right is guaranteed in due process clauses of the fifth and fourth amendments to the US constitution.
The 4th Amendment is about a person’s protection against the seizure of our property and privacy intrusion by the government.
The 5th Amendment deals with the rights of someone being accused of a crime
The U.S would approach a global issue by trying to send out our extra troops if we are available or by talking with the leaders of countries who are allies in wars.
Russia is the other nation a bit more likely than the UK. They would end up strategizing a way to fund a solution just as the US would or they will help by sending down sorts of weapons.
I hope this meets the criteria needed!
The appropriate response is Fundamental attribution error. It is our inclination to clarify somebody's conduct in light of inner components, for example, identity or mien, and to think little of the impact that outside elements, for example, situational impacts, have on someone else's conduct.