An example of such an event can be when the Civil War ended. The country went back to the gold standard and destroyed large sums of civil war money which was useless now. This led to a major deflation because there was suddenly much less money than before and the money had higher value than before.
i'm not really sure but i don't think the fall of nubia/kush had anything to do with being taken over by the kindom of aksum.. i may be incorrect tho!
The Reconstruction era is always a challenge to teach. First, it was a period of tremendous political complexity and far-reaching consequences. A cursory survey of Reconstruction is never satisfying, but a fuller treatment of Reconstruction can be like quick sand—easy to get into but impossible to get out of. Second, to the extent that students may have any preconceptions about Reconstruction, they are often an obstacle to a deeper understanding of the period. Given these challenges, I have gradually settled on an approach to the period that avoids much of the complex chronology of the era and instead focuses on the “big questions” of Reconstruction.
However important a command of the chronology of Reconstruction may be, it is equally important that students understand that Reconstruction was a period when American waged a sustained debate over who was an American, what rights should all Americans enjoy, and what rights would only some Americans possess. In short, Americans engaged in a strenuous debate about the nature of freedom and equality.
With the surrender of Confederate armies and the capture of Jefferson Davis in the spring of 1865, pressing questions demanded immediate answers.
One way to classify this poverty is to say that this is a situational poverty, that is, poverty caused by the situation (here, the hospital bill is caused by the accident).
It's different for example from generational poverty, when some aspects of poverty are inherited.
Well, I believe it to be true. As dirt roads, when they are wet tend to be harder to traverse. It largely depends on the context of the question, however