Answer:
Explanation:
If I was Frank I wouldn’t have disclosed the information from one company to the next, it is unethical and with an NDA information shouldn’t be passed on. Even though, it may have been an opportunity for the company he got hired and a threat to the company he disclosed the information from.
Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis
Answer:
Option D. The accountant was a member of a professional organization.
Explanation:
The reason is that for a successful claim under the negligence act, the claimant have to prove following three things:
- Duty of care existed between the relation
- She has suffered economic harm &
- The harm was proximately caused by the accountant's breach of the duty of care.
So the accountant's membership is not a valid requirement under the negligence act for a successful claim.
Answer:
The correct answer is Indirect exporting.
Explanation:
Indirect exporting is one that is carried out through third parties who act as intermediaries, and who in turn are responsible for all legal procedures in the destination country. In this, the producing company only has the obligation to put the products in the port and the buyer is in charge of the entire import, transport and distribution process within the destination country.
