Much to the chagrin of established firms, one clear super trend is that products and services must get to market faster because "more competitors are offering targeted products."
This is because it has been observed that several start-ups firms offer similar products to what the established firms are had as a business idea. Not only that, but they also target the same group of consumers.
Therefore, to remain top of the game and beat the startups out of business, the established firms must ensure their business ideas are quickly turned into products or services and get to the market faster.
Otherwise, the startups will take over their business ideas and a huge part of their targeted consumers.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the established firms must be proactive if they want to remain above the rest of their competitors.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/17557971
Answer:
If MPC is 0.8, Change in GDP = $500 million
If MPC is 0.95, Change in GDP = $2,000 million
Explanation:
<em>Expenditure Multiplier is the amount by which the real GDP will change if autonomous expenditure changes by a given amount.</em>
It is calculated as follows: 1/(1-MPC).
MPC is the portion of additional income that is spent. If the MPC is 0.8, then the expenditure multiplier will be = 1/(1-0.8) = 5
Using the first scenario with an increase in government spending by $100million, the resulting change in GDP would be
Change in GDP = change in autonomous expenditure × Multiplier
= 100 × 5 = $500 million
<em>Scenario 2, MPC of 0.95</em>
Expenditure Multiplier = 1/(1-0.95) = 20
Change in GDP= 100 × 20 = $2000 million
The method <span>of evaluating a capital investment project that use cash flows as a measurement basis are: </span><span>Payback period, internal rate of return, and net present value.
- PAyback period, used to determine how much asset is back after the initial saving
- internal rate of return, Used to measure potential profit from an investment
- Net present value, used to determine the worth of all company's assets</span>
Answer:
The answer to that question has a lot of unknown factors included. We can assume two different scenarios:
Scenario 1: the world's economy recovers completely in a relatively short amount of time. This would allow agricultural producers in Peru and the rest of the world to obtain forward contracts that are favorable to them.
Scenario 2: the world's economy doesn't recover fast enough. Since uncertainty would increase, so would the risk of future (forward) contract increase. When this happens, the weakest link suffers the most. in this case, the weakest link are the agricultural producers. The forward contracts would be carried out but the prices will be very low.
In Spanish:
Esta pregunta incluye muchos por si acasos que por el momento son totalmente inciertos. Podemos asumir 2 escenarios mundiales diferentes:
Escenario 1: la economía mundial se recupera rápidamente, lo que beneficiaría a los productores agrícolas peruanos (y de todo el mundo) ya que podrían obtener contratos de futuro muy favorables.
Escenario 2: la economía mundial nos e recupera lo suficientemente rápido, lo que incrementa el riesgo y la incertidumbre de los contratos a futuro. Cuando el riesgo aumenta, quien lo paga es el eslabón mas débil y en este caso son los productores agrícolas. Van a existir contratos a futuro, pero los precios serían muy bajos.
Answer:
Hire an external consultant to pick new team members for you
Explanation:
On the given scenario there are limited project spaces and plenty of volunteers for those positions.
An equitable and impartial method of choosing team members needs to be used to avoid conflict.
The best solution is to hire an external consultant who can be seen as impartial to do the selection.
This way employees will accept the objectivity of the selection since the external consultant does not have any underlying.interest in who occupies the project positions
