Anderson argued that nations emerged only after three beliefs were weakened: that elite languages (like Latin) offered unique access to truth about existence; that society was naturally organized around leaders who ruled through divine dispensation; and that the origins of the world and of humankind.
What does Benedict Anderson say about nationalism?
In the book Anderson theorized the condition that led to the development of nationalism in the 18th and 19th centuries, particularly in the Americas, and famously defined the nation as an “imagined community.” The nation is imagined, according to Anderson, because it entails a sense of communion or “horizontal.
What are the causes of nationalism?
The main reasons for the emergence of Nationalism in India are:
- Political, Economic and Administrative Unification.
- Impact of Western Education.
- Development of means of Transport.
- Socio-religious reform movements.
- Development of Media, Newspaper and Magazines.
- Britishers' exploited Policies.
- National Movements outside India.
What are Anderson's 3 paradoxes of nationalism?
Anderson's best-known book, “Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism,” first published in 1983, began with three paradoxes: Nationalism is a modern phenomenon, even though many people think of their nations as ancient and eternal; it is universal (everyone has a nation),
Learn more about Anderson's paradoxes :
brainly.com/question/16960876
#SPJ4
A historical argument is An argument is a set of propositions designed to demonstrate that a particular conclusion, called the thesis, is true. An argument is not simply a statement of opinion, but an attempt to give reasons for holding certain opinions.
And a historical question is like this. Those who seek to understand the past must formulate questions about the past, and answer those questions based on historical evidence. Now, let's review our key terms. The scientific method guides historians in understanding the past. The scientific method is is a process of investigation used to arrive at a truth.
So if you read threw these 2, you should be able to find the relationship. I really hope this helps and good luck on the quiz or test you are taking. :D
Answer:
A new border between North and South Korea was drawn, which gave South Korea some additional territory and demilitarized the zone between the two nations. The war cost the lives of millions of Koreans and Chinese, as well as over 50,000 Americans.
Explanation:idk what to put here :p
Courts of general jurisdiction typically have a judge and jury.
<h3>Further explanation
</h3>
A court of general jurisdiction is a court with authority to hear cases of all kinds for example the criminal, civil, family, probate, etc.
Courts of general jurisdiction typically have a judge and jury. A judge is a public officer who presides over a lower court of law. A judge may be appointed by the executive branch of government through the Attorney General. Judge analyze and interpret all evidence in a court of law regarding cases to dictate a fair verdict and a sentence when necessary. Judge act as impartial mediators in courts of law, taking part in hearings, civil litigation cases, etc.
Many cases begin in this court. Usually, the cases are like felonies, serious misdemeanors, fraud, bankruptcy, and other "white collar crimes". In this courts of general jurisdiction, cases are heard through trial by the jury.
One significant effect of the classification of a court is the liability that a judge from that court might face for stepping beyond the bounds of that court.
Whereas a jury is a group of ordinary individuals who are chosen by a court to hear the evidence presented by the defendant and the plaintiff and a jury gives a verdict on a case
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- Learn more about general jurisdiction brainly.com/question/6995997
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Grade: 9
Subject: history
Chapter: general jurisdiction
Keywords: general jurisdiction
Answer:
I think B is the right answer.
