•provide free meals for the homeless
•raise taxes on millionaires
•improve healthcare for the elderly
Answer:
The amount of the distributive share of partnership net income that is taxable by California is the share of the partnership's net income of $10,000 that can be attributed to Ewan.
Assuming he holds a 50% interest in the partnership, he is expected to pay tax on his share of the $10,000 (which is equal to $5,000) in California, where the income is earned and not where he resides.
Explanation:
A partnership as an entity does not pay taxes. But individual partners must pay taxes on their shares of the partnership income, whether it is actually distributed or not. The partnership usually lists the partners' income on Schedule K-1, while individual partners fill the normal individual tax returns.
Answer:
c. contributory negligence
Explanation:
Negligence occurs when a party does not do what is required of him in a given situation. It is being careless with one's responsibility.
Contributory negligence is when one does not show sufficient care for himself or is acts in such a way that contributes to an accident.
If a defendant is able to prove contributory negligence in the case of an accident the plaintiff will not be able to recover any damages.
For example if one enters a busy road when a green light for cars was on and there is an accident. He put himself in harm's way and will not be able to claim damages because he has contributory negligence
Answer:
Complicates process when the individual dies without a will
Explanation:
Complications arise especially when the disbursement favours those relatives that were closely related to the decedent. Even so, when the decedent leaves behind a spouse but no surviving children or their descendants, usually the spouse will receive the entire estate. There may also be concerns over the fact that the spouse will also receive the entire estate if the decedent and spouse had children together who are still alive based on the assumption that the surviving spouse will use the assets to care for the children which may not end up being the case. Another issue is the provision that allows for non-biological relatives if alive such past spouses to receive a distribution.
