Answer:
A, Owen has offered his new team a consideration.
<h3><em>
I hope this helped at all.</em></h3>
technically this is asking your own personal opinion but i will give an asnwer based on my knowledge of it:
"In my personal opinion, it is an unfair clause. If a criminal were to go to court for a crime and walk free he would never be able to be accused of that crime in the future. Detectives are always making new leads in cases and if they were to find any new eveidence, no matter how incriminating it was they would not be able to arrest him a second time.
Answer:
Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Explanation:
It's basically just like an independent government system that investigates undercover. I'm not sure if I'm exactly right but hope this helps.
Answer:
Complicates process when the individual dies without a will
Explanation:
Complications arise especially when the disbursement favours those relatives that were closely related to the decedent. Even so, when the decedent leaves behind a spouse but no surviving children or their descendants, usually the spouse will receive the entire estate. There may also be concerns over the fact that the spouse will also receive the entire estate if the decedent and spouse had children together who are still alive based on the assumption that the surviving spouse will use the assets to care for the children which may not end up being the case. Another issue is the provision that allows for non-biological relatives if alive such past spouses to receive a distribution.
