Employee theft coverage inventory will not be reimbursed if the only proof is loss in inventory or land and profit calculation.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
An employer or a businessman can claim indemnity or insurance in case his employee commits property theft under the Employee theft coverage. This coverage can help for indemnifying the loss of property, money or securities as result of theft by the employee.
However, inventory shortages are not covered under this cover if the only proof available is profit and loss calculation. But if there is other proof like video of the theft, etc. then such loss can also be covered under this insurance scheme.
Answer:
So you can have a just government and there's no confusion.
Explanation:
I hope someone can help you with a more detailed response!
Answer:
<u>Advertising Agencies</u>
Explanation:
Remember the product liability doctrine is a <em>claim</em> by a user or buyer of a product because of injury or damage caused by a defective product of a manufacturer after provision of reasonable proof.
Because Advertising Agencies do not produce these products but only advertise, the doctrine of strict product liability does not apply to advertising agency law which is <em>only dedicated to creating, planning, and handling advertising and other forms of promotion and marketing for clients.</em>
Answer:
Gin.
Explanation:
Gin Craze is a term for the sharp rise in alcoholism in England in the first half of the 18th century, when domestic entrepreneurs immediately threw themselves into the production of this brandy from available raw materials, such as grain and juniper, and flooded the country with cheap gin, where hard alcohol was a luxury item until then and people were used to drinking mainly beer.
As consequence, mass drunkenness erupted, especially in the slums of London, which led to an increase in crime and widespread demoralization. In 1743, it was recorded that the average Englishman consumed ten liters of gin a year. A number of scandals led to the British Parliament passing a series of so-called gin laws between 1729 and 1751, which banned the tapping of spirits without an official concession and significantly taxed gin production. Consumption therefore fell sharply, and the definitive end of Gin Craze marked the years 1757–1760, when the use of grain to produce alcohol was banned due to a large crop failure.
